Parent Visas
Australia offers both temporary and permanent visa options for parents of Australian citizens, permanent residents, or eligible New Zealand citizens. The right pathway depends heavily on budget, how urgently the parent needs to be in Australia, their age, and whether they eventually want permanent residency.
Permanent Visas
The permanent parent visa system operates on two tracks – contributory and non-contributory – which offer the same outcome but at very different costs and timelines.
The Contributory Parent Visa (Subclass 143 for offshore applicants, 864 for those onshore) is the faster of the two permanent options. Government fees typically exceed AUD $50,000 per applicant across both stages of the application, making it a significant financial commitment. In return, processing times are comparatively shorter. For many families, the cost is manageable when weighed against the certainty of a permanent outcome within a foreseeable timeframe.
The Non-Contributory Parent Visa (Subclass 103 offshore, 804 onshore) carries much lower fees (in the range of AUD $4,000 to $6,000) but the waiting period is extraordinarily long, often cited at 30 years or more. These visas are subject to a strict annual cap, and the queue has grown to the point where most immigration professionals consider it impractical for anyone seeking a realistic outcome. It may suit applicants who lodge early, have no urgency, and simply want a permanent visa on the record at minimal upfront cost.
Both permanent tracks require applicants to pass the balance of family test, which means at least half of the applicant’s children must be Australian citizens or permanent residents, or more of their children must live in Australia than in any single other country. This requirement catches some families off guard, particularly where siblings are spread across multiple countries.
Aged Parent
An Aged Parent option exists within both the contributory (864) and non-contributory (804) streams for applicants aged 67 or over who are already living in Australia. The key advantage is that eligible applicants can remain in Australia on a bridging visa throughout the waiting period, rather than having to wait offshore. This is particularly valuable for elderly parents who are already settled near family and cannot practically relocate back overseas for years at a time.
Assurance of Support (AoS)
These visas also require an Assurance of Support (AoS), which is a legal commitment from an eligible person in Australia (sponsoring child or another approved assurer) to provide financial support to the applicant so they do not rely on government income support. The assurer is required to lodge a financial bond with the Australian Government, which is held for a set period and may be used to recover any social security payments accessed by the visa holder during that time. The AoS is typically required prior to visa grant and applies for up to 10 years depending on the visa subclass.
Temporary visa – Subclass 870
For families who cannot wait years for a permanent visa to be processed, the Sponsored Parent (Temporary) Visa (Subclass 870) offers a faster and more accessible alternative. It allows parents to live in Australia for up to three or five years at a time, and can be renewed up to a maximum cumulative stay of 10 years.
Unlike the permanent tracks, the 870 does not require applicants to pass the balance of family test, and processing takes around eight months on average, a fraction of the time involved in permanent applications. It is capped at 15,000 grants per year, so applications early in the program year are advisable.
However, the 870 comes with meaningful restrictions. Parents on this visa have no work rights and must maintain continuous private health insurance from an Australian provider for the duration of their stay. Medicare access is not available. The visa is temporary by design and does not lead to permanent residency through this pathway alone.
The most important consideration is a strategic one: applying for or holding a Subclass 870 visa can close off access to the permanent parent visa pathways. Families who may eventually want to pursue a permanent outcome for their parent should take professional advice before lodging an 870 application, as the decision can have long-term consequences that are difficult to reverse.
The sponsorship process also requires the child in Australia to be separately approved as a sponsor before the parent can apply. The sponsor must be an Australian citizen, permanent resident, or eligible New Zealand citizen, have lived in Australia for at least four years, and meet an income threshold demonstrating they can financially support their parent during the stay. Government fees for the 870 are over AUD $6,000 for a three-year visa and over AUD $12,000 for a five-year visa, in addition to the sponsorship application fee.
FAQs
While a PhD is a strong foundation, the NIV prioritizes real-world innovation and economic impact. Here’s what you need in addition to your PhD to secure an invitation:
1. Demonstrated Innovation with Tangible Outcomes
Your research must translate into practical, high-impact results, such as:
- Patents (granted or filed in key markets like the US, EU, or Australia).
- Successful startups (revenue, funding, or acquisition).
- Industry adoption (your work is used by companies or governments).
- Prestigious awards (e.g., Breakthrough Prize, IEEE Honours, or major industry accolades).
Example:
“Holds a PhD in AI and 3 patents in computer vision—licensed by a Fortune 500 company.”
2. Clear Economic Contribution to Australia
The NIV is not an academic visa—you must prove how you’ll:
- Generate jobs (e.g., hiring plans for Australian talent).
- Attract investment (e.g., secured venture capital or grants).
- Commercialize research (e.g., partnerships with Australian firms).
Example:
“Launched a biotech spin-off post-PhD, with a pilot project in Queensland projected to create 20+ jobs.”
3. Alignment with Australia’s Key Industries
Your expertise should fit national priority sectors, such as:
- AI, robotics, and quantum computing
- Clean energy and climate tech
- Biotech and medical advancements
- Advanced manufacturing and space tech
Example:
“PhD in renewable energy, with a patented solar innovation aligning with Australia’s National Reconstruction Fund.”
4. Strong Nominator Support (Highly Recommended)
While not mandatory upfront, a credible nominator strengthens your case:
- Australian university (e.g., a former advisor now at an Aussie institution).
- Industry leader (e.g., a company using your research).
- Government/state program (e.g., if you’ve collaborated on funded projects).
Example:
“Nominated by a University of Sydney professor citing my PhD work’s industry applications.”
5. International Recognition & Mobility
A PhD from a top global university (e.g., MIT, Oxford) helps, but you should also highlight:
- Work experience in innovation hubs (Silicon Valley, EU, Singapore).
- Media features (e.g., Forbes, Nature, or TechCrunch).
- Collaborations with elite organizations (e.g., CERN, NASA, or DeepMind).
What Won’t Be Enough?
- A PhD without commercialization (patents, startups, or industry adoption).
- Academic papers alone (unless they’ve led to measurable impact).
- Vague intentions (e.g., ‘I want to research’—instead, show economic benefits).
Key Summary: PhD + What Else?
| Requirement | How to Show It |
|---|---|
| Innovation Proof | Patents, startups, awards. |
| Economic Impact | Job creation, funding, partnerships. |
| Sector Alignment | AI, cleantech, biotech, etc. |
| Nominator Backing | Australian university/company endorsement. |
| Global Profile | Top institutions, media, collaborations. |
The Australian Government implemented the new Skills in Demand (SID) visa to replace the existing Subclass 482 Temporary Skill Shortage (TSS) visa on 7 December 2024.
The Explanatory Memorandum accompanying the updated Regulations states that the changes are based on the government’s commitment to reforming the Australian migration system. The implementation of the Skills in Demand visa would ensure that the program would meet Australia’s skill needs while reducing the risk of visa holder exploitation and improving access to permanent residency.
Despite the name change and significant ambitions, the changes are better characterised as evolutionary rather than revolutionary. A fact suggested by retaining the same visa subclass and the majority of criteria.
Disclaimer!
Content on this page is for informational purposes only and not intended as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Australian immigration law is complex and its policies and visa eligibility criteria are changing regularly.